Subject: [jose] CLOSED: Is KID sufficently defined

From: Karen O'Donoghue <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:35:19 -0400

Folks,

The results of this poll were:
10 YES - KID is sufficiently defined and understood
2 NO - KID is not sufficiently defined and understood
0 DISCUSS - More discussion is needed

Based upon these results, I am making a consensus call that KID is sufficiently defined and understood.
This issue is now closed.

Thanks to all who participated in this poll.

Karen O'Donoghue (writing as working group co-chair)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:05 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [jose] POLL: Is KID sufficently defined

<CHAIR>

If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again.  If you want to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS.

Is the current text for KID sufficiently defined and understood?

Room vote:  2 yes, 0 no, 1 discuss

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose