Subject: [jose] OPEN: Criticality of understanding header fields

From: Karen O'Donoghue <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:35:52 -0400

Folks,

The results of this poll were:
9 YES - all header fields are critical
1 NO - all header fields are non-critical
4 MAYBE - header fields are marked critical or criticality should be defined by the application
3 DISCUSS - need to talk more

Based upon these results, I do not believe that a reasonable consensus call is possible
yet.  This issue remains open. Please comment on the mailing list and be prepared to resolve in
(or prior to) Atlanta. Thanks to all who participated in this poll.

Thanks to all who participated in this poll.

Karen O'Donoghue (writing as working group co-chair)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:05 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [jose] POLL: Criticality of understanding header fields

<CHAIR>

If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again.  If you want to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS.

What should be the criticality of header fields as defined by the core specification?

YES - all headers fields are critical
NO - all header fields are non-critical
MAYBE - header fields are marked critical or criticality should be defined by the application DISCUSS - need to talk more

Room vote:  2 yes, 0 no, 4 maybe, 3 discuss

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose