Subject: Re: [kitten] Updating RFC 3961 to require deterministic checksums

From: "Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 16:57:56 -0700

Generally +1. Will want to proof the next draft of course.

> On Sep 30, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Benjamin Kaduk <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 05:42:09PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
>> On 09/27/2017 10:15 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>>> 4. Include instructions in the IANA considerations section to update the
>>> registration policy for the checksum type registry that notes the additional
>>> constraint on checksum behavior.
>> 
>> Proposed wording (at the beginning of the IANA considerations section):
>> 
>>   The notes for the "Kerberos Checksum Type Numbers" registry should be
>>   updated with the following addition: "If the checksum algorithm is
>>   non-deterministic, see [this document] Section 4".
>> 
>> (where "Section 4" is an xref to the new "Update to Checksum
>> Specifications" section from my previous message in this thread.)
> 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> -Ben
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kitten mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

Personal email.  [email-masked]