Subject: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction-00.txt

From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:25:43 -0800

Draft updated.

This is an update from draft-li-area-abstraction. The name was changed per WG Chair request.

This version also addresses some comments received from Bruno Decraene.

The IPR disclosure for this document has been updated to reflect the new name.

As always, questions and comments are encouraged.

Happy holidays,
Tony

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: [email-masked]
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction-00.txt
> Date: December 7, 2018 at 10:15:01 AM PST
> To: "Tony Li" <[email-masked]>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction
> Revision:	00
> Title:		Level 1 Area Abstraction for IS-IS
> Document date:	2018-12-07
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		7
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction-00
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-lsr-isis-area-abstraction
> 
> 
> Abstract:
>   Link state routing protocols have hierarchical abstraction already
>   built into them.  However, when lower levels are used for transit,
>   they must expose their internal topologies, leading to scale issues.
> 
>   To avoid this, this document discusses extensions to the IS-IS
>   routing protocol that would allow level 1 areas to provide transit,
>   yet only inject an abstraction of the topology into level 2.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
>