Subject: RE: [Ltru] [psg.com #963] section on registration procedure is confusing

From: "Addison Phillips" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 08:31:15 -0700

It should be.

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
> Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
> Sent: 2005?5?11? 23:35
> To: LTRU Working Group
> Subject: [Ltru] [psg.com #963] section on registration procedure is
> confusing
> 
> Hi -
> 
> > Comment 35 in
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg00540.html
> > reads:
> > "35. 3.3. the registration procedure is of extreme confusion and mixes
> > the form to use, the lack of definition of the requester, the iana.org
> > list which is not introduced, the registration request which must be
> > guessed, a non commented MAY, registration tricks, comments on probable
> > behaviour of the reviewing list, digression on Slovenian, designation
> > of the reviewer by the IESG, what should happen when the review period
> > has elapsed without any guidance to the reviewer, that a IANA list
> > Members and an IESG designated reviewer make an IETF decision, that the
> > initial registrant has some moral pre-eminence (under the form of a
> > comment) and that languages are not considered for registration on the
> > fact they actually exist, but on their own (non documented) merits."
> 
> Has this been accommodated by the changes present in the -01 draft?
> 
> Randy, ltru co-chair
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru