Subject: [Ltru] documenting the update load (gen-art #5)

From: "Addison Phillips" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:51:57 -0700

> > Update Load
> > There has been considerable debate about the expected load of 
> > updating the registry especially over the next couple of years.  It 
> > might be worth adding some notes about the expected load and 
> > emphasising that such changes will have minimal impact on 
> > applications due to the backwards compatibility rules.
> [Addison Phillips]
> 
> Aside from revisions to document in question, the day-to-day activity 
> of the ietf-languages list has been fairly steady over its lifetime. 
> That isn't expected to change. The number of ISO 639-1/-2 and ISO 3166 
> registrations in a given year has tended to be small (on the order of 
> a dozen relevant changes per year). The addition of ISO 639-3 or ISO 
> 639-6 has been considered as a possibility, but that would be a 
> special case and be coincident with a revision of the document.

I would suggest that we do nothing for this.

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
http://www.quest.com

Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group
http://www.w3.org/International

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru