Subject: [Fwd: [manet] Charter Clarification]

From: Alvaro Retana <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:29:35 -0400

Second try...

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [manet] Charter Clarification
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alvaro Retana <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked], [email-masked]
CC: Alex Zinin <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]

Joe/Ian:

The WG charter currently reads:

   Using mature components from previous work on experimental reactive and
   proactive protocols, the WG will develop two Standards track routing
   protocol specifications:

   - Reactive MANET Protocol (RMP)
   - Proactive MANET Protocol (PMP)

I have two questions:

1. Is the intent to *only* consider updates or descendants of the 4
    experimental protocols the WG worked on??  If so, why??

2. Is rfc2501 the document to be used to evaluate the proposals??  Or are
    there any other guidelines wrt requirements??

I may have missed these discussions, so feel free to point me to the
appropriate thread.

Thanks!!

Alvaro.

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet