Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-05.txt

From: Justin Dean <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 13:20:26 -0400

+1 from me on moving this forward.

Unless someone speaks up soon on why this shouldn't be last called I'm
going to start the process.

Justin

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Abdussalam Baryun <
[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Henning,
>
> Thanks for the update, I think also that it can go for last call, I will
> try to review in the coming days, but short comments below.
>
> 1-I think the draft calls this metric as DAT metric, as you mention in the
> draft in other sections, so we can mention this in the title or in Abstract
> or in introduction.
>
> 2-suggest to add to the Abstract:
>
> The DAT metric document describes a new routing metric for
> OLSRv2. It takes both the loss rate and the link speed into
> account to provide additional information of the links within the MANET.
>
> 3- The applicability statement is excellent, however, my only comment is
> that it mentions the word 'metric' (meaning this specification metric) but
> could we clarify it in this section as DAT metric, or just say the metric
> specification.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> AB
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Henning Rogge <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:45 AM,  <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> >
>> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> >  This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Working Group
>> of the IETF.
>> >
>> >         Title           : Packet Sequence Number based directional
>> airtime metric for OLSRv2
>> >         Authors         : Henning Rogge
>> >                           Emmanuel Baccelli
>> >         Filename        : draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-dat-metric-05.txt
>> >         Pages           : 17
>> >         Date            : 2015-04-21
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I posted a last revision of the DAT metric draft based on a review I
>> got from Fabian Nack.
>>
>> The change is small, I renamed two variables to make their usage more
>> clear and fixed a mixup between two variable names in the metric
>> update.
>>
>> I think DAT should be ready for last call...
>>
>> Henning Rogge
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>