Subject: [Megaco] trouble with wildcarding

From: milton mukhopadhyaya <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 01:12:01 -0800 (PST)

Hi,
I have problems in the following scenarios.Can u
please provide clarification?

1.Scenario: 

Context=c1 {
		Modify=a/b/* { …}
           }
a/b/* resolves in a set of terminations {a/b/t1,a/b/t2
,a/b/t3,a/b/t4}. In this set a/b/t4 belongs to the
context c1, but a/b/t1, a/b/t2, a/b/t3 do not belong
to the context c1. Should we generate error messages
for a/b/t1, a/b/t2 and a/b/t3?Which error code is to
be sent (431 or 435)?

2.

trouble with wild-card-return token -:
Scenario:

Context 1 -> {t1/1, t1/2}
Context 2 -> {t1/3}
Termination t1/1  supports package aaa, package bbb
Termination t1/2  supports package ccc
Termination t1/3  supports package bbb

>From MGC to MG:

Context = * {w-auditvalue = t1/*{
                           audit{packages}
             }

	     modify = t1/*{
			   signals{…}
			  }
	}

>From MG to MGC:
MG may reply to the above request in the following two
ways:

Reply 1: 

Context = *{w-auditvalue = t1/* { packages { aaa, bbb,
ccc}}}
Context = 1 { modify = t1/1, modify = t1/2}
Context = 2 { modify = t1/3}

Reply 2: 

Context = 1 { w-auditvalue = t1/* {aaa, bbb,ccc}
		Modify = t1/1
		Modify = t1/2
		}
Context = 2 { w-auditvalue = t1/* {bbb}
		Modify = t1/3
		}	

WHICH ONE IS RIGHT?
Mukta Vasudeva

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco