Subject: Re: [MEXT] [Recharter.2]

From: "xuke" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:05:42 +0800

Hi All,

I would like to support:

[CR] Interaction between Mobile IPv6 and IPsec/IKE by PF_KEY extensions

Regards,

xuke
Tsinghua University

On Feb 12, 2008 7:31 AM, Julien Laganier <julien.IETF at laposte.net> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This is the next step in the recharter process. We'd like to get input
> from WG participants on what should be the items included in
> rechartering, what are their priorities, and who is willing to
> sustain the effort. When that step is completed we will take the WG
> input and discuss with our AD to move forward with deciding what to
> include or not in the charter. Your input should be sent to the list
> during the following two weeks, by 2008-02-26.
>
> Please pick from the list of items below the items you think the WG
> should work on, and order them in decreasing priority (just to make
> sure, first priority items goes first in the list you're making :).
>
> List of items:
>
> Binding Revocation for IP Mobility
> MIPv6 home link operation in various SDOs
> IP Tunneling Optimization in a Mobile Environment
> Generic Notification Message for Mobile IPv6
> GRE requirements for IPv6 mobility
> 4283bis to extend MN identifier to other identifiers
> Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping for the Authentication Option Protocol
> Interaction between Mobile IPv6 and IPsec/IKE by PF_KEY extensions
> Virtual Home Link configuration for Mobile IPv6
> Extend DSMIPv6 Home Network Support
>
> Also, please prefix each of the items in your list with the letters E, C
> and/or R if you're willing to:
>
> - [E]dit: Are you willing to edit the draft corresponding to the
>   item.
>
> - [C]ontribute: Are you willing to propose text for the draft.
>
> - [R]eview: Are you willing to review new revisions of the draft when
>   being asked by the chairs.
>
> As an example, that could be one input list:
>
> E MIPv6 home link operation in various SDOs
> CR Binding Revocation for IP Mobility
> R IP Tunneling Optimization in a Mobile Environment
>
> meaning that the MIPv6 home link is first priority and you volunteer to
> edit, Binding revocation is second priority and you're willing to
> contribute and review, while IP tunneling optimization is third
> priority and you're willing to review.
>
> Hope this is understandable :)
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- julien and marcello, MEXT chairs
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT at ietf.org
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext