Subject: [mif] #10: walled garden use case #1 is invalid as a motivation

From: "mif issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 06:58:28 -0000

#10: walled garden use case #1 is invalid as a motivation

 Quoting from IAB document http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3002 section 4.2.1
 :

 "It was strongly recommended that independent of the ubiquity of
 the 'walled garden' deployment scenario that protocols and
 architectural decisions should not target this model.  To continue
 the success of Internet protocols at operating across a highly
 diverse and heterogeneous environment the IETF must continue to
 foster the adoption of an 'open model'."

 As such, I believe that the IETF should not permit walled garden scenarios
 to be presented as valid motivations.

-- 
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  ek@…         |      Owner:  draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-
     Type:  defect       |  option@…
 Priority:  major        |     Status:  new
Component:  dhcpv6       |  Milestone:
  -route-option          |    Version:
 Severity:  -            |   Keywords:
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mif/trac/ticket/10>
mif <http://tools.ietf.org/mif/>