Subject: [Mip6] [issue19] MH type selector should not be mandated

From: Vijay Devarapalli <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:35:39 +0000

New submission from Vijay Devarapalli <[email-masked]>:

Francis wrote:

I still believe the document goes to the wrong direction, for instance
requiring support for MH type selectors when it is expected than the
common policy will be to protect all the packets on the MN-HA tunnel
(better for privacy, simpler, and easy to implement by BITW).

-----------------

the default mode should be the same than in 3776, i.e.,
MH protocol as the selector. But the two others (all traffic and only
the critical MH types) have to be allowed.

----------
category: Technical
draft: draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec
messages: 66
nosy: vijay
priority: Must fix
status: Pending
title: MH type selector should not be mandated

_________________________________________________
Mip6 issue tracker <[email-masked]>
<http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/mip6/issue19>
_________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6