Subject: [Mip6] [issue44] Review by Steve Bellovin: Section 5.3

From: Hannes Tschofenig <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:07:49 +0000

Hannes Tschofenig <[email-masked]> added the comment:

Henrik says: 

> >     Issue 1: If the firewall(s) block ESP traffic, many of the MIPv6
> >        signaling (e.g.  Binding Update, HoT) may be dropped ...
> ...snip...
> >        performing Route Optimization, since Binding Update, 
> HoT and other
> >        MIPv6 signaling must be protected by IPsec ESP.
> 
> 	I don't see how this differs from Section 5.1, and don't see
>   	that it belongs here.

I added text to address the different style of the described issues in this 
section.

_________________________________________________
Mip6 issue tracker <[email-masked]>
<http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/mip6/issue44>
_________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6