Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] updated RTSP version number

From: "Thomas Zeng" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:44:01 -0800

I like "1.1", too.

BTW, for some us not present in Minneapolis, is there an estimate on
when rfc2326bis will go WG LC?

Thanks
-thomas

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rishi Mathew <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:50:21 -0800
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] updated RTSP version number
To: Magnus Westerlund <[email-masked]>, "mmusic
(E-mail)" <[email-masked]>

Magnus,

This is a very good idea!

Thanks,
Rishi.

At 08:06 AM 3/24/2005, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
Hi,

When we had the offline RTSP discussion in Minneapolis we shortly
discussed the version number for the updated specification. Of the
present it was agreed that giving it version number 1.1 is the simplest
and best way of indicating that this a entity is supporting the updated
specification.

Reviewing last years discussion on this topic, it seems that most people
supports this. So this email is to confirm that there exist rough
consensus on this topic, before we authors will implement it.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email-masked]

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

Rishi Mathew
Software Development Engineer
Helix Development Support Group
Real Networks, Inc. 
[email-masked]
http://www.helixcommunity.org
http://www.realnetworks.com/products/support/devsupport.html

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic