Subject: [NEXTEL-1] RE: Haven's latest reply comments

From: Marcel <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:31:52 -0500

------- Original Message --------
   From: "Todd Ellis" <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: [220] Haven's latest reply comments

 But does their position in their response conflict with the 5th R&O then? (assuming they
actually said that in the R&O)Todd Ellis

     -----Original Message-----
     From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
     Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:09 AM
     Subject: Re:  Haven's latest reply comments

     In a message dated 11/11/2002 9:37:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
     [email-masked] writes:

    >  Regarding AMTS:  The Commission in the 5th Report and Order removed the
    >  requirement to provide service coverage to waterway traffic.

     ?  Did I miss something?  I did not read the Commission's 8/16/02 Response to
     Haven's Petition for Declaratory Ruling that way at all.