Subject: RE: LDP

From: Gary Tate <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:18:12 +0100

We do not support LDP DOD. Our implementation is LDP Downstream Unsolicited.

I believe you will find LDP DOD is mostly implemented in ATM environments to
avoid cell interleaving between ATM Label Switch Controllers.

Brgds
Gary Tate 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Srinivas T M [mailto:[email-masked]]
>Sent: 27 September 2001 17:10
>To: [email-masked]
>Subject: LDP
>
>
>Hi,
>   Which following implementation is best suitable for
>LDP protocol ?
>
>1. Control Driven DOD.
>2. Topology Driven DOD.
>3. Topology Driven DU.
>
>  In which scenarios, LDP is suitable for each
>implentation of Control Driven DOD, Topology Driven
>DOD and Topology Driven DU ?
>      I think LDP is best suitable for Topology Driven
>DOD and Topology Driven DU. Is it right? 
>
>  Is cisco or Juniper or any company using LDP
>protocol for Control Driven DOD implementation ?
>
>
>Thanks,
>Srini.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
>http://phone.yahoo.com
>