Subject: Re: [mpls] draft-tsb-mpls-tp-ach-ptn

From: Larry <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:12:47 +0800 (CST)

Support!
I think the cooperation mode of allocating the Ethertype to Y.1731 provides a good example.

Best regards,

            Han Li

*************************************************************************
Han Li, Ph.D 
China Mobile Research Institute
Unit 2, 28 Xuanwumenxi Ave, Xuanwu District, Beijing 100053, China 
Fax: +86 10 63601087 
MOBILE: 13501093385 
*************************************************************************

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Rui Costa
> Sent: 11 March 2011 03:32
> To: mpls at ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] draft-tsb-mpls-tp-ach-ptn
> 
> Hello,
> 
> The draft provided by the TSB draft-tsb-mpls-tp-ach-ptn requests the
> allocation of an Associated Channel Type value that will allow ITU-T to
> develop OAM tools required to address the needs identified by some ITU-
> T members. Allocation of this value will make more efficient use of
> resources of both IETF and ITU-T. The use of this associated channel
> type fully complies with the framework and architecture for MPLS-TP.
> 
> 
> The draft also describes the cases where networks that run the ITU
> defined OAM tools are interconnected to networks that run the IETF
> defined OAM tools. In most cases it is a client/server relationship and
> no interworking is required. If a LSP or PW originates in one domain
> and terminates in the other domain then the IETF OAM tools must be
> used.
> 
> This draft should be discussed in Prague.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Rui
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls