Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf

From: "Hejia (Jia)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 05:52:30 +0000

Yes, support.

One tiny comment, the reference to [RSVP-TE-CONF] could be replaced by RFC 7487 now.  

B.R.
Jia

-----Original Message-----

Subject: 	Re: [mpls] working group last call for
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf
Date: 	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:59:46 +0000
From: 	Ross Callon <[email-masked]>
To: 	[email-masked] <[email-masked]>
CC: 	Loa Andersson <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
<[email-masked]>, [email-masked] <[email-masked]>, [email-masked] <[email-masked]>

Reminder, the WGLC for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-09 ends later this week. So far there are no responses.

If you care about this document, then please read it and reply to the WGLC.

Thanks, Ross

*From:*mpls [mailto:[email-masked]] *On Behalf Of *Ross Callon
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:46 PM
*To:* [email-masked]
*Cc:* [email-masked];
[email-masked]
*Subject:* [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf

Working Group,

This is to initiate a working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-09.

Because this WGLC will span the IETF in Dallas, it will be extended to just over three weeks.

Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list ([email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>).

There are no IPR disclosures against this document. All the authors have stated that they

are not aware of any IPR that relates to this draft (two of the responses were private to

the WG chairs).

This working group last call ends Thursday  April 2, 2015.

Ross

for the MPLS WG chairs