Subject: Re: [mpls] Requesting WG LC for draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels

From: Alexander Okonnikov <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 19:21:48 +0300

Hi Pavan,

Regular RSVP-TE LSPs use standard RSVP path MTU discovery mechanism. 
That one cannot be used "as is" for approach described in the draft, and 
the draft doesn't address path MTU identification. Is it to be considered?

Thank you.

26.07.2018 06:07, Vishnu Pavan Beeram пишет:
> Chairs, Hi!
>
> As mentioned (in our presentation) in last week's WG session, we 
> believe that the draft is sufficiently baked and ready to progress to 
> the next stage. We would like to formally request this draft to be 
> considered for WG LC.
>
> Regards,
> - Pavan (on behalf of the authors)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls