Subject: [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-12.txt

From: Chandrasekar Ramachandran <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:17:55 +0000

Chairs,
All comments that were raised during the IESG review have been addressed in version 10 (draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-10) and there are no open issues. Versions 11 & 12 are only refreshes to keep the draft alive.
We (authors and contributions) 	would like to request the chairs to progress this draft to the next stage.

Thanks,
Chandra.

Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] <[email-masked]> 
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2021 4:08 PM
To: Chandrasekar Ramachandran <[email-masked]>; Chandrasekar Ramachandran <[email-masked]>; Dante Pacella <[email-masked]>; Ina Minei <[email-masked]>; Tarek Saad <[email-masked]>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-12.txt

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-12.txt
has been successfully submitted by Chandra Ramachandran and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:           draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr
Revision:       12
Title:          Refresh-interval Independent FRR Facility Protection
Document date:  2021-12-19
Group:          mpls
Pages:          27
URL:            https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-12.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!W5v-a3BaMtZGAJDFhYG0_jXBWbH84i1tpGksusRzxZhlaOG_3iuFhPNVMLad7HE$
Status:         https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!W5v-a3BaMtZGAJDFhYG0_jXBWbH84i1tpGksusRzxZhlaOG_3iuFhPNVpOC2reg$
Htmlized:       https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!W5v-a3BaMtZGAJDFhYG0_jXBWbH84i1tpGksusRzxZhlaOG_3iuFhPNViF7ahKM$
Diff:           https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-12__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!W5v-a3BaMtZGAJDFhYG0_jXBWbH84i1tpGksusRzxZhlaOG_3iuFhPNV7E-7AY0$

Abstract:
   RSVP-TE Fast ReRoute extensions specified in RFC 4090 defines two
   local repair techniques to reroute Label Switched Path (LSP) traffic
   over pre-established backup tunnel.  Facility backup method allows
   one or more LSPs traversing a connected link or node to be protected
   using a bypass tunnel.  The many-to-one nature of local repair
   technique is attractive from scalability point of view.  This
   document enumerates facility backup procedures in RFC 4090 that rely
   on refresh timeout and hence make facility backup method refresh-
   interval dependent.  The RSVP-TE extensions defined in this document
   will enhance the facility backup protection mechanism by making the
   corresponding procedures refresh-interval independent and hence
   compatible with Refresh-interval Independent RSVP (RI-RSVP) specified
   in RFC 8370.  Hence, this document updates RFC 4090 in order to
   support RI-RSVP capability specified in RFC 8370.

The IETF Secretariat