Subject: RE: [nemo] draft-ng-nemo-multihoming-issues-01.txt

From: "Paik, Eun Kyoung" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:20:01 +0900 (KST)

Hi all, Hi Chan-wah,

The taxonomy of your draft is very clear. Thank you for your work.

While I was working on multi-homed NEMO, I have found many problems

other than the listed problems in your draft (at the end of section 4).

The problems. e.g. BU, egress selection, etc., are differ as the taxonomy.

IMHO, we'd better to define the problems and make a consensus on them,

since R12 in the requirement draft defines that the NEMO solution must function for multihoming.

Regards,

Eun Kyoung Paik

Seoul National University

> -----Original Message-----

> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of Chan-

> Wah Ng

> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 6:56 PM

> To: IETF NEMO WG

> Subject: [nemo] draft-ng-nemo-multihoming-issues-01.txt

> Hello, all,

> We have submitted a new version of the multihoming draft for

> publication. It might take sometime for the draft to appear in the IETF

> repository. Meanwhile, it can be accessed via the following link:

> http://www.sfc.wide.ad.jp/~julien/papers/draft-ng-nemo-multihoming

> -issues-01.txt

> Please give us your comments. Hopefully, we can get it updated and

> ready for discussion by the Vienna IETF.

> Thanks.

> --

> Chan-Wah Ng

> Panasonic Singapore Laboratories

____________________________________________________________________________

Unique & Best, 한미르 아바타!
(http://avatar.hanmir.com/)