Subject: Re: [netlmm] Is DAD needed for MN-HoA in PMIPv6

From: Behcet Sarikaya <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:23:25 -0700 (PDT)

Bruno,
  My answer is yes, this is what we had in some of the scenarios in
draft-sarikaya-netlmm-prefix-delegation-00.txt

Regards,

--behcet

----- Original Message ----
From: Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet <[email-masked]>
To: netlmm <[email-masked]>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:55:55 AM
Subject: [netlmm] Is DAD needed for MN-HoA in PMIPv6

Hi all,

Just a question related to proxy mip6 draft:

If a Mobile Node is allowed/asked by a MAG to perform stateless address 
autoconf., does the mobile node needs to perform DAD procedure for the 
MN-HoA after it has received a MN-HNP and generated an interface identifier?

Thanks for your reply.
Bruno.

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm