Subject: Re: [Netslices] Initial Draft Agenda for COMS BoF

From: Qin Wu <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 20:20:46 +0000

Yes, top down and bottom up can not be separated.
We have a draft to investigate top down and bottom up interact with each other for agile service creation, delivery and maintenance.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-00

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Netslices [mailto:[email-masked]] 代表 Jari Arkko
发送时间: 2018年3月15日 3:51
收件人: Alex Galis <[email-masked]>
抄送: Benoit Claise <[email-masked]>; Adrian Farrel <[email-masked]>; Jeff Tantsura <[email-masked]>; Gonzalo Camarillo <[email-masked]>; NetSlices <[email-masked]>
主题: Re: [Netslices] Initial Draft Agenda for COMS BoF

FWIW, my personal opinion is that there critical issue is demonstrating we can actually connect the top-down and bottom-up in some way. Sometimes it is useful just as a thought exercise to consider what would be the smallest possible thing we could do and how that relates to existing pieces. E.g., "we will extend a data model from WG X in this manner". Or "we make a new construct that can be mapped to something in WG Y". Does someone have an idea what the possible answer might be? Once we know an answer (or some), we can then extend to bigger things and see how far we want to go.

Jari

_______________________________________________
Netslices mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices