Subject: [Nfvrg] draft-irtf-nfvrg-nfv-policy-arch-03 - comments and suggestions

From: Andrew Veitch <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:34:05 +0000

Hi,

I have another short comment and question.

At the bottom of paragraph 3 in section 2, is the sentence.

"In this document, such domain configurations are called policy enforcement technologies to set them apart from the actual policy intent, e.g., "a given customer must be given platinum treatment" as in the above example."

This makes perfect sense for the abstract concept / quasi-specific action example.

But my question is this.  In what you call a specific action (what I would prefer be called a specific resource, though maybe I should expand that a bit), might you not have an intent that does specifically reference a “policy enforcement technology”?

For example, “All customer A traffic should have DSCP of AF23”?

Thanks.

Andy

Andrew Veitch |Senior Architect | International Mobile: +1 (781) 366-7763 | www.Netcracker.com<http://www.netcracker.com/> | Focused Forward

________________________________
The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.