Subject: RE: [NSIS] radius/qos question

From: Tschofenig Hannes <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:11:19 +0200

hi yacine, 

thanks for pointing me to this document. i have read it some time ago
(years). i should certainly take a look at it again. 

maybe dave was referring to some issues in this document. i don't know. 

ciao
hannes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 6:04 PM
> To: Tschofenig Hannes
> Cc: 'David Oran'; [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [NSIS] radius/qos question
> 
> 
> hi hannes,
> 
> you will find some answers to your question in this document: 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3127.txt?number=3127
> 
> but take it cautiously: it dates back to 2001 and time went by 
> meanwhile, especially concerning COPS...
> 
> thanks,
> yacine
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Tschofenig Hannes wrote:
> > hi dave, 
> > 
> > in the meeting minutes i recorded a small comment on radius and qos
> > authorization: 
> > 
> > "
> > Dave: People often want to envelope authorization. Radius 
> is no tightly
> > synchronized to provide this functionality ; COPS is. 
> > "
> > 
> > could you provide more details on your thoughts about the 
> relationship
> > between radius/qos vs. cops/qos? 
> > 
> > thanks in advance. 
> > 
> > ciao
> > hannes
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > nsis mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
> > 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis