Subject: Re: [nvo3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-yong-nvo3-frwk-dpreq-addition-00.txt

From: "Bitar, Nabil N" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:12:47 -0500

Hu,
Sorry catching up after the holidays/vacation. Would it be another way to
look at below is to say that in the case of Ipv4 for instance every VM is
addressed with IP address X/32. If this is the case, won't this case be a
degenerate case of a subnet and you will be effectively doing inter-subnet
routing always?

Thanks,
Nabil

On 12/21/12 11:25 PM, "Kireeti Kompella" <[email-masked]>
wrote:

>Luyuan,
>
>On Dec 21, 2012, at 9:53, "Luyuan Fang (lufang)" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>> Route (IP traffic) within subnet is happening, regardless physical or
>> virtual, vpn or non-vpn, call it enhanced/advanced forwarding.
>
>I would say, "will be happening" (today, default is bridging), but, yes,
>agree.
>
>Kireeti.
>
>_______________________________________________
>nvo3 mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3