Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09

From: Vishwas Manral <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 03:31:04 -0700

Hi Vivek,

Is there a reason we need to support compatibility with an older version of OSPFv2 (RFC1583) in OSPFv3?

Regarding a previous mail of yours
"ospfv3AreaSummary: The variable should also effect NSSA areas. Description should be updated"
We will update the description to also state NSSA (to be consistent with OSPFv2 MIB).

Thanks,
Vishwas
________________________________________
From: Mailing List [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Vivek Dubey
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:53 PM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-09

No configuration support is provided for "ospfRFC1583Compatibility " in OSPFv3?

Thanks
Vivek

On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 Dilip Kumar wrote :
>Hi,
>    I would like to know if Router Address TLV's value field MUST
>contain a syntatically correct IP Address. I mean, is it OK if an OSPF
>router advertises Opaque LSA (TE) with an syntatically incorrect IP
>address (ex. 0.0.0.54 etc.) in Router Address TLV ?
>
>Thanks,
>Dilip