Subject: [p2p-sip] NATs and P2P

From: RADHIKA.R.ROY at saic.com (Roy, Radhika R.)
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:27:32 -0500

Hi, all:

SIP into XML-RPC and similar things were proposed in the past (some drafts
were written). Now, probably the time has come to revisit of those
interesting ideas.

Best regards,

Radhika

  _____  

From: p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Mike Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:36 AM
To: P2P-SIP
Subject: Re: [p2p-sip] NATs and P2P

That sounds interesting idea to me.

-- mike.
-------------------------
Mike Robinson
VoIP Trainer and Consultant

Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com> wrote:

Dean Willis writes:

> Skype does a lot of its work by doing things like 
> tunneling over port 443. The IETF is NOT going to accept any RFCs 
> that include this sort of stuff. It's just not going to happen. 
> It's a religion thing.

how about what i suggested: map SIP into XML-RPC rather than tunnel
over? what kind of IETF religion would prevent that?

-- juha
_______________________________________________
p2p-sip mailing list
p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/p2p-sip

  _____  

Yahoo! Mail
Use
<http://pa.yahoo.com/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=38867/*http:/photomail.mail.
yahoo.com>  Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/p2p-sip/attachments/20060322/a34ea116/attachment-0001.html