Subject: [p2p-sip] SIP, ICE, and an Overlay Network

From: slavitch at objectworld.com (Michael Slavitch)
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:51:16 -0500

What is the IETF standard for that? 

Michael Slavitch           Lead, Strategic Initiatives 
slavitch at objectworld.com   Objectworld Communications Corp. 
+1.613.599.9698 .225       Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

-----Original Message-----
From: p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Juha Heinanen
Sent: March 15, 2006 4:09 AM
To: Aki Niemi
Cc: 'P2P-SIP'
Subject: Re: [p2p-sip] SIP, ICE, and an Overlay Network

Aki Niemi writes:

 > I think it still has value in SIP, as in being able to register the
> public IP/port instead of the private ones. 

any decent proxy can detect if a UA is behind NAT and register
automatically both public and private addresses/ports.

-- juha
_______________________________________________
p2p-sip mailing list
p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/p2p-sip

--

-----------------------------------------------

This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. 

Any views, opinions and content presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and may not represent those of Objectworld Communications Corp.