Subject: [p2p-sip] Problem statement for P2P SIP NAT traversal

From: slavitch at objectworld.com (Michael Slavitch)
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 12:55:41 -0500

All the better! This means is that there are no excuses! 

Michael Slavitch           Lead, Strategic Initiatives 
slavitch at objectworld.com   Objectworld Communications Corp. 
+1.613.599.9698 .225       Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Quittek [mailto:quittek at netlab.nec.de] 
Sent: March 8, 2006 12:37 PM
To: henry at pulver.com; Michael Slavitch; 'Michael Slavitch'; 'P2P-SIP'
Subject: Re: [p2p-sip] Problem statement for P2P SIP NAT traversal

Henry,

--On 3/8/06 11:04 AM -0600 Henry Sinnreich wrote:

>> I am not sure, this technology is already mature enough for 
>> standardization at the IETF.
>
> About 80% of the Internet traffic is P2P and it does NAT traversal.
> This should be good enough.

But 95% or more of this P2P traffic deals with concrete IP(v4) addresses
and is a little bit more down to earth compared to Michael's view when
it solves the NAT traversal problem.
This could be good enough.

Thanks,

    Juergen

> Thanks, Henry
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu
> [mailto:p2p-sip-bounces at cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Juergen Quittek
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:59 AM
> To: Michael Slavitch; Michael Slavitch; P2P-SIP
> Subject: Re: [p2p-sip] Problem statement for P2P SIP NAT traversal
>
> Michael,
>
> I like your view.  We have implemented this concept already and are 
> promoting it.  But currently, we limit promotion to research projects.

> I am not sure, this technology is already mature enough for 
> standardization at the IETF.  Let's see.
>
> And let's see what the (future) working group thinks about it.
>
> Thanks,
>
>     Juergen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2p-sip mailing list
> p2p-sip at cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/p2p-sip

-----------------------------------------------

This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. 

Any views, opinions and content presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and may not represent those of Objectworld Communications Corp.