Subject: [P2PSIP] New revision of HIP BONE

From: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:22:46 +0200

Folks,

we have just submitted a new revision of HIP BONE:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-camarillo-hip-bone-01.txt

we have tried to address the comments received on the list. In 
particular, the draft now clarifies that hop-by-hop routing uses the 
overlay as a rendezvous service, where routing tables are located in the 
architecture and what modules populate them and access them, and why 
there are no circular dependencies at bootstrap time.

The draft also documents the issues discussed on the list related to 
making HIP optional, mandatory, or not even an option for P2PSIP systems.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip