Subject: [P2PSIP] RELOAD BAse: Grammar for overlay name?

From: Dean Willis <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:16:53 -0600

Stephen Farrell asks: in 14.15: is reg-name sufficiently clear for the overlay name? For example, that allows percent encoding - are those variant names all the same overlay? I guess so, but it'd be good to confirm and maybe say that in the document.

Marc and I looked at it during IETF 85 and thought maybe reg-name was not a good fit. What should be used here?

--
Dean