Subject: Re: [Pce] Adding Service in draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing

From: Qin Wu <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 02:12:54 +0000

Hi,
Here is the update of draft-dw-pce-service-segment-routing-01
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dw-pce-service-segment-routing-01.txt
It belongs in draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing since service has already been supported in the SPRING use case.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-use- cases-01

It would be a good idea to merge the idea from this draft into draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing.
Since what we proposed in this draft is just a minor extension to draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing, 
i.e., add service segment support in the segment routing WG draft, It seems not worth 
having a separate draft to document this minor extension.

Also This draft has been discussed in the last PCE meeting. we believe we have addressed comment raised in the last meeting.
We like to ask WG's opinion on merging this draft with draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing.

Regards！
-Qin/Dhruv
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Siva Sivabalan (msiva) [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: 06 January 2015 01:39
> To: Dhruv Dhody; Jan Medved (jmedved); Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil); 
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Jeff 
> Tantsura
> Cc: Dhruv Dhody; Qin Wu; JP Vasseur; Julien Meuric
> Subject: RE: Adding Service in draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing
> 
> Hi Dhruv:
> 
> Sorry for the delay.
> 
> I will get back to you sometime next week.
> 
> Thanks,
> Siva
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 11:49 PM
> To: Siva Sivabalan (msiva); Jan Medved (jmedved); Clarence Filsfils 
> (cfilsfil); [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; 
> Jeff Tantsura
> Cc: Dhruv Dhody; Qin Wu; JP Vasseur; Julien Meuric
> Subject: Adding Service in draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing
> 
> Hi Authors,
> 
> [1] describes 'services' in SPRING usecases. Qin and I feel we can 
> simply extend the WG document [2] to handle this instead of a separate document [3].
> 
> We have taken a stab at it (see attached), let us know your opinion on it?
> 
> Regards,
> Dhruv / Qin
> 
> [1] 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-use-
> cases-01
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-00
> [3] 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dw-pce-service-segment-routing/