Subject: RE: W bit

From: "Shekhar, Ravi" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 15:20:50 -0400

> AFAIK rfc2362 didn't explicitly talk about s,g joins to the RP, but I
> seem to remember an email where Dino confirmed that s,g.rpt joins
> toward the RP should be supported.
> 

  <S, G>RPT joins are at least useful in overriding <S, G>RPT prunes. 
  Sending <*, G>join to override has unwanted effect of getting all 
  other pruned <S, G> data too.

  - Ravi Shekhar.