Subject: FW: Summary of Policy Meeting Sessions in London

From: Ed Ellesson <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 06:50:10 -0400

Here is the summary of the two working groups sessions held this week in
London.  This is what I forwarded to Bert for the summary due our AD at the
end of the IETF.

I will send draft minutes next week.  

Cheers, 
Ed

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Ed Ellesson  
> Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:18 PM
> To:	'Joel M. Halpern'; 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'
> Subject:	Summary of Policy Meeting Sessions in London
> 
> 1.  PolTerm:  Multi-wg lc issues resolved, draft updated.  Will submit  to
> IESG
> 
> 2.  PCIMe:  
> 	Issues requiring changes to current draft:
> 			Class Name: change IPHeaderFilter, to read
> IPHeadersFilter
> 			How to specify "don't care" for a filter:  Bob Moore
> to review and submit appropriate text
> 			Criticality of conditions and actions:  Add warning.
> Text to be supplied by Joel working with Bob.  No additions to the model.
> 			Compliance language:  Add text: "musts" and "mays"
> come in at the level of the submodel and not at level of PCIMe model.  
> 	Issues resolved with no changes to current draft:  
> 			Encoding of filter properties:  IpVersion,
> Addresses, Ports
> 			"Do until failure " ExecutionStrategy
> 			Complete list of fields to filter on  
> 			Policy explict variables
> 			Compounding Policy Conditions
> 			Evaluation and Execution Order
> 
> 3.  QDDIM:  
> 	Modeling of Droppers:  Walter/Bob to write text
> 	Preamble Marking: New text to broaden the scope  (John S./Walter) 
> 	No changes: Modeling of queues/scheduler, and the four examples
> 
> 4.  PCLS: Status of IESG last call reviewer comments:
> 	DMTF Normative References:  Lee will provide updated policy from
> DMTF in couple of weeks.  John will provide to reviewers to determine if
> norm ref is now ok.  
> 	X.500 considerations:  John will update, incl. various fixes, moving
> content of structure rules and removing the rules.  
> 	IESG LDAP reviewers:  John will update, incl. various fixes to
> improve readability, content rule treatment, clarifications, moving text
> around, fixing typos, formatting, etc.  
> 	Another review cycle by LDAP/X.500 reviewers required  
> 
> 5.  QPIM:   
> 	General agreement on the content, altho more review required
> 	Offline discussion on the abstraction concept
> 	One more version, and then to last call (6wks?)
> 
> 6.  Next IETF:
>       One session in Salt Lake, then queisce wg.  
>       Schemas need to be closed before following ietf. 
> 
> 
>