From proto-team-bounces@ietf.org Sun Jul 31 11:19:48 2005 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DzFbQ-0008RR-E8; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:19:48 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DzFbO-0008Nh-DN for proto-team@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:19:46 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA01657 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:19:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110] helo=mail-white.research.att.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzG7T-0007p4-KR for proto-team@ietf.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:52:56 -0400 Received: from bright.research.att.com (bright.research.att.com [135.207.20.189]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22085A7BBA for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 11:19:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by bright.research.att.com (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id j6VFJYtA022214; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:19:34 +0200 Message-Id: <200507311519.j6VFJYtA022214@bright.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: proto-team@ietf.org Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:19:34 +0200 From: Bill Fenner Versions: dmail (linux) 2.6d/makemail 2.10 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed Subject: [proto-team] AUTH48 shepherding? X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Process and Tools Team List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org The RFC Editor already cc's WG Chairs on the AUTH48 announcement. I know that we talked about this long ago, but should we have the WG chairs chase after the authors (so that the RFC Editor isn't solely responsible for getting signoffs from recalcitrant authors?) Bill _______________________________________________ proto-team mailing list proto-team@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team From proto-team-bounces@ietf.org Sun Jul 31 16:59:42 2005 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DzKuM-0006rm-7D; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:59:42 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DzKuF-0006nq-UI for proto-team@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:59:38 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA18328 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:59:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from concorde301.adptelecom.net ([212.180.41.212]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzLQO-0007gi-3s for proto-team@ietf.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:32:49 -0400 Received: from open-26-80.ietf63.ietf.org (unknown [10.11.0.93]) by Concorde301.adptelecom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB961C9706; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:13:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:50:20 +0200 From: Aaron Falk To: Bill Fenner , proto-team@ietf.org Subject: Re: [proto-team] AUTH48 shepherding? Message-ID: <1B7ADF597FDF2F657E616CF6@nak.isi.edu> In-Reply-To: <200507311519.j6VFJYtA022214@bright.research.att.com> References: <200507311519.j6VFJYtA022214@bright.research.att.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.1.1 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Process and Tools Team List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org --On July 31, 2005 5:19:34 PM +0200 Bill Fenner wrote: > > The RFC Editor already cc's WG Chairs on the AUTH48 announcement. > I know that we talked about this long ago, but should we have the > WG chairs chase after the authors (so that the RFC Editor isn't > solely responsible for getting signoffs from recalcitrant authors?) Yes! --aaron _______________________________________________ proto-team mailing list proto-team@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team