Subject: [PWE3] draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-tc-mib-10 - PwFragStatus TC

From: "Ben Wright" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:00:11 -0000

Hi David, 

We found a bug in the PwFragStatus TC.  The descriptions of bits (3) and (4) don't match the TC syntax.  I've suggested text below which assumes the syntax is correct. 

Also, I notice this field has BITS syntax.  However, from the description of each bit they appear to be mutually exclusive and can't be set together.  Is this correct? 

Best regards,
Ben.

PwFragStatus ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION

DESCRIPTION
" ...

  remoteFragCapable(3) bit indicates that the local node was not configured for fragmentation, but the peer is capable of it.

   fragEnabled(4) bit indicates that the local node was configured for fragmentation and that the peer has the capability to accept fragmented packets."

SYNTAX   BITS {
         noFrag (0),
         cfgFragGreaterThanPsnMtu (1),
         cfgFragButRemoteIncapable (2),
         remoteFragCapable (3),
         fragEnabled (4)
         }

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3