Subject: RE: [rohc] RE: The 'b'-bit

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:39:52 -0600

> The only requirement is that the identity of the
> sending endpoint MUST be verified by the application just as for a
> state creation request.

A quick question: is this about case a), b), or c)? 

a) determine if a *received* announcement sent by remote
endpoint is legitimate;
b) determine if an announcement *created* locally by a 
received sigcomp message is allowed to be sent back to 
the remote endpoint that sent the sigcomp message
c) both a) and b)

I'm asking this because this thread started as case b) 
(see below), but it seems what you said above is about a)?

endpoint 1                     endpoint 2
                 m(S0)
map M to S1  ------------>    create M, and S1=S0+M

        announcement: b=0, shared_id=M
           <--------------------
Br,
Zhigang

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc