Subject: RE: [rohc] sigcomp issue lejo-9

From: "Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:34:56 +0200

> CABO: So, 256 different versions should be enough for quite some time
> (a century if we standardize a new version every five months).
> Since the UDVM version actually needs to be transported around, one 
> additional byte may not be entirely trivial.

You're right, I just forgot to change that (too simple modification to remember). The text should then be:

"SigComp requires a 1-octet name space, the SigComp_version,
to be created by the IANA. Upgraded versions of SigComp must
be backwards-compatible with version 0x00, described in this
document. Adding additional UDVM instructions and assigning
values to the reserved UDVM memory addresses are two possible
upgrades for which this is the case.

Following the policies outlined in [RFC-2434], the IANA policy
for assigning a new value for the SigComp_version shall require
a Standards Action. Values are thus assigned only for Standards
Track RFCs approved by the IESG."

/L-E 

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc