Subject: [rohc] Closed: Closing sigcomp issues - Instalment 1

From: "Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:56:08 +0200

Since we now seem to be satisfied with the solution for cabo-10, and
and since we have not heard any other objections to Instalment 1,
we can now consider these issues as closed.

BR
/Lars-Erik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL) 
> [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: den 17 april 2002 20:56
> To: [email-masked]'
> Subject: [rohc] Closing sigcomp issues - Instalment 1
> 
> 
> Dear SigComp fellows,
> 
> We should try to stepwise close the open SigComp issues, starting from
> the summary list provided by Carsten:
> http://www.dmn.tzi.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/udvm/
> The list has been available for some time, so it should be reasonable
> by now to consider the issues to which solutions have been 
> proposed without objections, as closed.
> 
> After studying the issues list and the mail discussions, I believe the
> following issues should be possible to close:
> lejo-1
> lejo-2
> lejo-3
> lejo-4
> lejo-5
> lejo-6
> lejo-11
> rp-2
> rp-3
> rp-4
> rp-5
> rp-6
> rp-7
> zliu-1 (covered by cabo-15 and lejo-3)
> zliu-2 (covered by lejo-1)
> cabo-13
> cabo-12
> cabo-10
> cabo-9
> cabo-7
> cabo-1 (covered by rp-2)
> cabo-2
> cabo-14 (covered by rp-7)
> cabo-5 (covered by cabo-6)
> sugar-1
> sugar-2
> sugar-4
> sugar-5 (covered by cabo-8)
> lejo-edit-*
> 
> If anyone has objections to closing any of the above issues, according
> to the summary list provided by Carsten, please let us know 
> NOW, which and
> why it should not yet be closed. 
> 
> For the other issues, please let us cooperate to get proposed 
> actions for
> all of them. Then we can hopefully close also these. We need 
> to speed up
> significantly if we want to get this ready in time for 3GPP.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> /L-E
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Lars-Erik Jonsson
> IETF ROHC WG Chair
> E-mail: [email-masked]
> Phone: +46 920 20 21 07
> Home: +46 920 999 57
> 
> My opinions are my personal opinions and should not be considered
> as the opinions of my employer, if not explicitly stated. 

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc