Subject: [rohc] Closed: Closing sigcomp issues - Instalment 3

From: "Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 10:49:45 +0200

Since we have not heard any objections to Instalment 3,
we should now be able to consider all documented SigComp
issues as closed.

Please note that the WG last-call for SigComp is ongoing,
and will end Wednesday 2002-05-15, 15:00 UTC.

BR
/Lars-Erik

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL) 
> [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: den 7 maj 2002 16:44
> To: [email-masked]'
> Subject: [rohc] Closing sigcomp issues - Instalment 3
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> After closing almost all SigComp issues, as listed in Instalment 1
> and 2, we have only 7 issues left to close. 
> 
> These issues are:
>    lejo-7
>    lejo-8
>    rp-1
>    rp-8
>    cabo-11
>    cabo-8
>    cabo-16
>   
> From what I can see, the updated draft provides solutions to all these
> issues. The draft has not yet been announced, but can be found at:
> http://www.dmn.tzi.org/ietf/rohc/draft-ietf-rohc-sigcomp-06.txt
> 
> My understanding of the proposed solutions is the following:
> 
> lejo-7:
>   Text has been cleaned up in the updated draft.
> 
> lejo-8:
>   New term compartment included in order to avoid possible
>   confusion with the term session.
> 
> rp-1:
>   Security considerations has been updated.
> 
> rp-8:
>   The STATE-CREATE instruction has been included in the updated draft.
> 
> cabo-8:
>   The STATE-FREE instruction has been included in the updated draft.
> 
> cabo-11:
>   Text has been cleaned up in the updated draft.
> 
> cabo-16:
>   The reserved addresses have now been extended from 10-15 to 10-31.
> 
> 
> Please let the group know if there are any objections to the
> resolutions provided by the updated document.
> 
> BR
> /Lars-Erik
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Lars-Erik Jonsson
> IETF ROHC WG Chair
> E-mail: [email-masked]
> Phone: +46 920 20 21 07
> Home: +46 920 999 57
> 
> My opinions are my personal opinions and should not be considered
> as the opinions of my employer, if not explicitly stated. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rohc mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
> 

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc