Subject: [rohc] comment on ROHC-TCP

From: Kuntal Chowdhury <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:38:26 -0600

Hello folks,
I think we need to separate the issues between a single short lived TCP 
connection (rare event) from multiple (near-)simultaneous short lived
TCP connections. The reason being, the scenario of single short lived 
TCP connection applies to both HTTP1.0 and 1.1, however the scenario of 
multiple short lived (near-)simultaneous TCP connections may be a 
problem with HTTP1.0 only (HTTP1.1 solves the problem with persistence 
and pipelining as default behavior). Therefore I suggest, we split 
section 3.3 to discuss single short lived and multiple 
(near-)simultaneous short lived TCP connections separately.

Thoughts?

-Kuntal

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc