Subject: RE: [rohc] Shared mode

From: "Surtees, Abigail" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:19:07 -0000

Hi Carsten,

Thanks for these comments.  I've changed the first sentence of the
recommendation paragraph to:

'Consequently, where NACK is not supported or for NACK averse compressors,
the recommendation is ...'.

Is this what you meant?  I'm open to further suggestions of text.

Best regards,

Abbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 5:20 PM
> To: Surtees, Abigail
> Cc: 'Lajos Zaccomer (IJ/ETH)'; Carsten Bormann; [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [rohc] Shared mode
> 
> 
> Hi Abbie,
> 
> two more little wording proposals:
> 
> On Nov 05 2004, at 09:18 Uhr, Surtees, Abigail wrote:
> 
> > However, for a compressor to try and avoid generating NACKs
> 
> s/generating/causing the generation of/
> 
> Also, please make sure that in the recommendation paragraph, 
> you again 
> say what the presumptions are -- this is bound to be cited out of 
> context.
> 
> Gruesse, Carsten.
> 

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc