Subject: RE: [rohc] Shared mode

From: "Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 08:27:35 +0100

Carsten and others,

I think we are all aware we are talking about functionality
defined in an informative document. However, since we have now
provided non-normative suggestions for how to implement, we
should also provide clarifications to what might be misleading
in that informative document, as well as recommendations for
how to actually implement. Personally I believe the impl.
guide is the right place to put such clarifying text, and of
course the WG will have to decide what we think are the proper
suggestions to put there.

/L-E

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of
> Carsten Bormann
> Sent: den 4 november 2004 07:47
> To: West, Mark
> Cc: Surtees, Abigail; Carsten Bormann; [email-masked]; Adam 
> Roach; Lajos
> Zaccomer (IJ/ETH)
> Subject: Re: [rohc] Shared mode
> 
> 
> Mark,
> 
> your message confuses me.
> 
> When you say "the WG needs to choose" -- are you talking 
> about changes 
> to normative documents, or are you talking about the 
> recommendations we 
> are making for compressor implementers?
> 
> Gruesse, Carsten
>

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc