Subject: [RPSEC] Topic 8: Section 4.9 Discarding of Control Packets (aka underclaiming?)

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:50:13 -0500 (EST)

"If the compromised (bad) router partitions the network, i.e. the
router is the only path between two good routers, then the bad router
can avoid forwarding the routing information on to the network on the
other side."

Does this make a similar claim to the "underclaiming" part that routers
are under some obligation to advertise everything that they know?
Or to maintain a peering/connection/neighbor adjacency when they
don't want to?

--Sandy
_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec