Subject: RE: [RRG] Renumbering...

From: "Heinrich Hummel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:56:25

Tony Li wrote: 

I think the real question is whether aggregates are required at all. If so, 
then I think we have an issue that leads us down the NAT path. 

Now, if someone has some mapping technology that does not require 
aggregation at all (DHTs?), then there is a possible alternate to NATs. 

In answering: 
This is exactly the key point of my approach: forwarding without being based on aggregates of Unicast user addresses. 
Address aggregation is a problem just because of the huge quantity. Additionally, it is principally wrong in view of user mobility and eventually router mobility. 

Heiner