Subject: RE: [RRG] GSE History

From: "Templin, Fred L" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:12:38 -0700

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tony Li [mailto:[email-masked]] 
>Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:04 PM
>To: 'Brian E Carpenter'; 'RJ Atkinson'
>Cc: 'IRTF Routing RG'
>Subject: RE: [RRG] GSE History
>
>
> 
>
>|Of course, that was a long story in itself but I think
>|people were deeply concerned about several points, and
>|the proponents of 8+8 didn't answer those points
>|(well, not until quite recently). And meanwhile, a lot
>|of Classic IPv6 code has shipped, so software inertia
>|has appeared.
>
>
>Of course, you also have to wonder just how much inertia there 
>is when the
>predominant implementation can't do DNS over v6.  ;-)

"can't do", or didn't see the value and chose not to do?
(NB: AFAICT, the implementation can still resolve AAAA's
just fine...)

Fred
[email-masked]

>I, for one, am to the point where all claims of "we can't 
>change" are simply
>folks trying to justify "we don't want change".  Sorry, 
>non-starter.  This
>is life and change is inevitable.  Unless you're still using a 
>telegraph key
>as your primary data communications tool, you're capable of change.
>
>Tony
>
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with the
>word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg