Subject: RE: [Rserpool] Re: draft-ietf-rserpool-comp-00.txt

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:36:02 -0500

Erik,

The process we would follow would be to read the internet draft first
and then the working group would make the decision on whether to make it
a working group item as Qiaobing indicates below.

-- maureen

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Qiaobing Xie
To: Erik Guttman
Cc: Loughney John (NRC/Helsinki); [email-masked]
Sent: 7/17/01 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Rserpool] Re: draft-ietf-rserpool-comp-00.txt

Erik Guttman wrote:
....
> > I think that is OK, but would require a submission along the lines
of
> > "Using SLP for RSerPool Name Service" and then we could address
> > the comparison better in this document.
> 
> Is there general interest in the working group in accepting this as
> a work item?  I am eager to collaborate with others on this, provided
> there's support for investigating alternatives.

From my past experience, the working group will have to read the draft
first before it can decide whether to make the draft into a work item.

-Qiaobing

> 
> Erik
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rserpool mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool

_______________________________________________
rserpool mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool

_______________________________________________
rserpool mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rserpool