Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-03.txt

From: Uma Chunduri <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:13:44 +0000

Dear All,

This version has been presented today  at RTGWG, IETF-95.
Would request further comments/suggestions.

--
Uma C.

-----Original Message-----
From: rtgwg [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 7:36 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-03.txt

Dear RtgWG,

This update gets the content from https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures-03 to make an unified draft for MHP handling and other procedures related LFA/RFC 5286.

Your comments, suggestions are most welcome.

--
Uma C.
(one behalf of all co-authors)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 12:07 AM
To: Shraddha Hegde; Jeff Tantsura; Pushpasis Sarkar; Hannes Gredler; Chris Bowers; Bruno Decraene; Uma Chunduri
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-03.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-03.txt
has been successfully submitted by Uma Chunduri and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
Revision:	03
Title:		LFA selection for Multi-Homed Prefixes
Document date:	2016-01-19
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		17
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-03.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-03
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-03

Abstract:
   This document shares experience gained from implementing algorithms
   to determine Loop-Free Alternates for multi-homed prefixes.  In
   particular, this document provides explicit inequalities that can be
   used to evaluate neighbors as a potential alternates for multi-homed
   prefixes.  It also provides detailed criteria for evaluating
   potential alternates for external prefixes advertised by OSPF ASBRs.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg