Subject: Re: [Sdn] SDN literature survey with 400+ references (call for community feedback/contributions)

From: Christian Esteve Rothenberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:55:21 -0300

Dear fellows,

we are pleased to share that the submission of the SDN survey has been
accepted for journal publication (Proceedings of the IEEE).

We would like to thank the feedback received via Email and github:
https://github.com/SDN-Survey/latex/wiki

During the next two weeks we will be working on the final version
based on the comments received by the reviewers and additional
enhancements we have identified.

Please, let us know if you have any change suggestion to be
incorporated in the printed version of the survey. After that we plan
to keep the "living document" in github & arxiv updated based on both
our and the community contributions.

Cheers,
Christian (on behalf of all co-authors)
Abs,
Ch

On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Christian Esteve Rothenberg
<[email-masked]> wrote:
> I believe subscribers of the SDNRG may be interested in the SDN survey we
> have been working on and we intend to keep evolving over time.
>
> While we have mainly focused on the "canonical" OpenFlow split control
> approach to SDN, we have tried to capture the existence of alternative SDN
> definitions and related work going on at IETF/IRTF --a discussion that
> certainly could be improved and for which we very much welcome feedback and
> contributions.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian
>
> PD: Apologies for any duplicates
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Christian Esteve Rothenberg <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:26 AM
> Subject: SDN literature survey with 400+ references (call for community
> feedback/contributions)
> To: openflow-discuss <[email-masked]>
>
>
> Dear fellows,
>
> we have been working on a comprehensive survey on SDN which currently
> features 400+ papers:
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.0440
>
> We are certain that our survey could include inaccuracies, and giving
> the pace and vast amount of ongoing work, the work is certainly
> incomplete and already outdated.
>
> In addition to targeting a journal publication, we would like to keep
> the arxiv version updated and evolving over time as a "living
> document"  that grows  in size and quality based not only on our own
> findings but also on feedback and contributions from the community in
> an open source like approach.
>
> Hence, we are hosting the source files of the survey in the following
> github repository:
> https://github.com/SDN-Survey/latex/wiki
>
> and welcome feedback and direct editorial contributions via github
> Issues and Pull Request mechanisms.
>
> We would be thankful if you share our SDN survey (along the call for
> community involvement) among your peers.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
>
> Christian (on behalf of all co-authors)
>
> --
> Christian