Subject: [seamoby] RE: Repeat: Seamoby Context Transfer Design Team Requirements kic k-o ff conference call, Monday, March 12, 2001, 11 am EST

From: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 14:32:30 -0600

Gary,

Thank you for all the good work so far and thank you for arranging the conference calls.
I should be able to attend the conference call.

Regards,
Madjid Nakhjiri

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Kenward [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 2:15 PM
To: [email-masked]
Cc: 'seamoby'; 'Pat Calhoun'
Subject: Repeat: Seamoby Context Transfer Design Team Requirements
kick-o ff conference call, Monday, March 12, 2001, 11 am EST
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

(This is a repeat of a previous message. There was a typo in the date 
under the conference call information which has been fixed)

This email is formal request for participation in the next
Seamless Mobility Context Transfer Design Team conference call.

In the past we have held these calls on Monday mornings
at 11 am EST. I have tentatively scheduled the next meeting
for Monday, March 12, 2001 at 11 am EST. However, this time
can be changed *if* there is a consensus. Keep in mind that there
are participants on three continents, at least, and it is difficult
to accommodate everyone.

As I understand it, the design team's next task is the 
development of a *requirements* draft. We must complete this 
draft before the ADs will consider giving us the go-ahead to work on 
solutions. 

The *tentative* agenda is:
	 *	attendance, hellos, etc.
	 *	selection of an editor for the requirements draft
	 *	rules for authorship
	 *	discussion of format / table of contents
	 *	action items
	 *	meeting schedule

We have this week to modify this agenda.

The conference call information is:

Date: 			Monday, March 12,  2001
Time:			11 AM EST.
US Phone Number: 	972-684-6338
PassCode:		793142

I request that all replies to this email be copied to the
seamoby and seamoby_context lists to ensure that 
there is an open discussion and an archive.

Thank you,
Gary Kenward

PS  I assume that a consensus means 50% + 1 of the respondents.