Subject: [Seamoby] [issue3] Specifying IPsec between ARs

From: John Loughney <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:28:05 +0000

New submission from John Loughney <[email-masked]>:

John said: Do folks think that mandatory IPsec is 
reasonable here?

Hesham Said: Yes. And you need to specify how to do that. I 
mean, a side effect of this would be that all UDP traffic 
will be secure (from a quick read I saw that UDP is the 
transport protocol for CTP).

----------
category: Technical
document: draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-xx.txt
messages: 3
nosy: jloughney, seamoby
priority: Should Fix
status: Pending
title: Specifying IPsec between ARs
__________________________________________________________
Seamoby CTP Issues <[email-masked]>
http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp/issue3
__________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby