Subject: RE: publickey-subsystem-03: extending last call by a week.

From: "Richard Whalen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:33:32 -0400

The changes are ok with me.

Though we have an implementation that says it conforms to version 2,
it currently only checks for success status, so I expect that the
new status code will be harmless.

-------------------
Richard Whalen
Process Software

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On
> Behalf Of Bill Sommerfeld
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 7:57 PM
> To: der Mouse; Jon Bright
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: publickey-subsystem-03: extending last call by a week.
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 18:50, [email-masked] wrote:
> > 	Title		: Secure Shell Public-Key Subsystem
> > 	Author(s)	: J. Galbraith, et al.
> > 	Filename	: draft-ietf-secsh-publickey-subsystem-03.txt
> > 	Pages		: 19
> > 	Date		: 2005-8-24
> 
> der Mouse: is this revision acceptable to you?
> 
> everyone else: are you ok with this version?
> 
> I'm going to extend the WG Last call timer by a week to August 31st
> since there's an actual wire protocol changes (a new status code) in
> this revision.
> 
> 					- Bill
> 
> 
>