Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops

From: Eric Osterweil <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:11:57 +0800

One other minor comment/question about this draft:
The term ``Matched'' is defined, and only used once in combination with covered.  Considering that the document seems to (rightly) try to remain decoupled/agnostic of the system design of the RPKI, is this distinction important enought to keep?  The benefit to dropping it would just be less terminiology and might help readability.

Thanks,

Eric