Subject: [Sip] open issues addressed by looseroute (Open issue #159)

From: Robert Sparks <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:01:49 -0500

Several open issues motivated the looseroute proposal:

#159: Source routing (should we allow Route to be loose?)
#161: Called party usage of local outbound proxies with RR
#218: Ordering of maddr, route, domain processing in proxies
#284: Forming the Request-URI when using a Default Outbound Proxy
#368: Outbound proxy handling

We have consensus on #159 that we should allow loose-routing
and the loose route proposal specifies the mechanism. There hasn't
been any comments indicating this is totally broken, and several
comments of general support. We will proceed with the mechanism and
refine it as we find places that need it.

I'll be posting on the others individually, noting their resolution.

RjS

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip