Subject: RE: [Sip] willis-sip-answeralert-00

From: "Francois Audet" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:08:12 -0500

Because that would be another session.

You would get the phone stopping ringing, then ringing again. The boss
could try to answer in between too.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Willis
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 10:43
> To: Audet, Francois [SC100:9T51:EXCH]
> Cc: IETF SIP List
> Subject: Re: [Sip] willis-sip-answeralert-00
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 7, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Francois Audet wrote:
> 
> > For UPDATE, I'm thinking of a caller calling an individual (say a 
> > secretary calling the boss). Phones ring, no answer. Secretary then 
> > presses the "intercom" key to force auto answer.
> >
> 
> Why is this significantly better than just sending a CANCEL, followed 
> by a whole new INVITE that requests auto-answer?
> 
> --
> Dean
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email-masked] for questions on current 
> sip Use [email-masked] for new developments on the 
> application of sip
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip